Genre Reading Response
Long and Wall (2012) and Frow (2006) both discuss the
conventions and meaning that makes media texts, in terms of genre. Long and
Wall (2012) also looks at “the way in which stories are ordered as narrative at
rhetorical and semiological levels”.
Genre is defined by Long and Wall (2012) as “a recognisable
grouping, subset or type of media form compromising the paradigmatic elements
(stories, rhetoric, signification) that are drawn upon in the creation of
individual syntagmatic texts”. This means that each genre has recognisable
elements that create the genre. These elements are used by producers to create
media products, so that audiences can easily find the generic product they are
looking for.
In relation to this, Frow (2006) says “Genre, we might say,
is a set of conventional and highly organised constraints on the production and
interpretation of meaning.” In contrast to this, Long and Wall (2012) say
“Without differences between generic texts, they would soon lose their
popularity” and without repetition, they would not be recognisably generic.
Genres can lose their popularity and become exhausted “by
the degree to which repetition has outweighed innovation or usefulness” Long
and Wall (2012). Media texts have to be
the same to those in their genre, but at the same time different, so that
consumers have an incentive to keep on consuming – genres have to be dynamic.
“The need for innovation encourages tampering with generic
conventions to produce ‘something different’ in order to attract new audiences”
Long and Wall (2012). Producers are always evolving their media texts and
products to fit new, different or relevant genres so that they can still reach
their consumers or reach new ones. I think that this is an important part of
genre, as the world is always changing and growing. Popular culture is always
changing. But to keep consumers interested, there will always be a “horizon of
expectations” that can be modified. This is defined by Frow (2006) as “to
designate the structured set of knowledge and values that form the background
understanding for any reception of a text”.
For further study, I would be interested in researching what
paradigmatic elements make up video content of popular ‘YouTubers’ from
different genres, using genre analysis. I would research the generic features
of the texts, and some features of the wider genres that the videos belong to,
but do not exhibit. I would also look into what rhetorical devices are used to
create the story told. I would also research how this creates meaning to the
audience (however that could cross into audience research which would require a
different type of methodology). Genre
analysis is the most appropriate methodology to use, as it is specific to
researching genre. It builds on rhetorical and semiological analysis.
References
Frow, J. (2006) Genre.
London: Routledge.
Long, P. and Wall, T. (2012) Media studies: texts,
production, context. 2nd edn. Oxon: Taylor & Francis.
No comments:
Post a Comment